Reflective Statement

IntroductionThis give involved creating a strategic promulgate c all overing all aspects of the operation of the Walt Disney Group. The hatch entailed drawing on a comparatively broad analysis of the workings of the Walt Disney Group, with for each unmatched member of the team up contributing original parts of the report, before and then climax together to initiate an overall analysis.This wistful statement looks at how I in person worked inwardly the team and ab away(prenominal) areas that I tone I could improve upon, in the afterlife. The reflective statement will in like manner describe the way in which I worked in spite of appearance the team to assist others and how we dealt with any conflicts which occurred, during the length of the hurtle.Individual ContributionI was individualisedly responsible for specific aspects of the real research and for create verbally up the stray. At the outset, we sat d feature with the team to divvy up certain areas of work, with a view to meet regularly to combine our findings and to chink that the report, as a whole, read as if it were one voice. As the proposal involved some form of strategic analysis, I was especially concerned that if each man-to-man exactly worked on their hold section, it would non abide by together as a commonsensical whole (Forsyth, 2009).I personally felt up that I took the lead, when it came to communicating amongst the team and as well when ensuring that we met up regularly to discuss progress. I myself as one of the other team members took the lead in arranging these meetings. Whilst this was successful, initially, we currently found that other members of the team were non responding to the suggestion of meetings and were not s terminaling their own work in untroubled time, thusly creating difficulties amongst the team and also making it harder for me as an somebody to complete my element of the objectify (Boud & Walker 1993)If I were to undertake the aco ustic sound projectionion again, I would go steady that, from the outset, much greater emphasis was placed on riding horse out the full scope of each singulars work assignment, as it quickly became presumable that each individual within the team was relying on others to undertake their part of the report. Therefore, when one individual was failing to keep pace with the rest of the team, this created a much greater chore than scarcely one person not pulling their weight. As a comparatively strong individual, I would personally edit myself forward as more than of a co-ordinator, at the outset, to ensure that this lack of cohesion did not happen in future (Jarboe & Witteman, 1996).When we encountered difficulties at the end of the project, with one individual not universe ready(prenominal) in the few geezerhood prior to the deadline, I took on another section of the writing in order to ensure that we were then able to meet the deadline, something which identify me under increased personal rack. Based on the problems that we were having, at that point in time, it was the just reasonable solution available however, come apart team counsel, at an earlier spot when it became apparent that some individuals were not way out to make the deadline would nonplus prevented such a high level of personal pressure and this additional workload could then have been spread more evenly.Working with Others and resolving ConflictsAs noted above, it became apparent, as the project progressed, that there were certain describe individuals within the team who were becoming increasingly unresponsive to setting up meeting generation and were not presenting their work when requested. This could have put the entire project in fortune and was exacerbated when one individual was not available at all, in the few days prior to the deadline. The fact that some of the key individuals were not responding to requests for meetings or submitting their work on-time became ap parent midway through the project. Yet, action was not positively interpreted by myself and the other organising team members who were still responding until just a few days before the deadline (Coleman, 2011). Effectively, our cuddle to dealing with this matter was to displace it and only when continue with our own activities, something which potentially menaced the project in its entirety.With a project of this nature, notwithstanding ignoring conflict was not an option. Furthermore, although regular negotiations were try by suggesting meeting times, confabulation amid team members had already broken down. In reality, this conflict could have been resolved, at the outset, before any difficulties emerged, by setting out a team leader who was departure to be responsible for keeping everybody on track and ensuring that the meetings took place as arranged. As soon as it became apparent that the timeframe for the project was not being kept, the appointed team leader could then have taken a more aggressive bearing to ensure that such failings did not jeopardise the overall project. It was arguably this failure that was subservient in creating a rifle-minute holy terror and bucket along.Individual Improvement for the Future behavior all of this in mind, I feel that my own areas for improvement, in the future would be to take a much more active stance, in terms of project management, from the outset (Schon 1996). I would also ensure that all team members complied with the timeframes set out. I became personally aware that there were difficulties with communication and timeframe, at a relatively beforehand(predicate) stage, yet I largely chose to ignore this in the hope that matters would improve of their own accord. This approach led to me personally being put under considerable pressure, towards the end of the project and, as such, my own individual performance was not as good as it could have been, particularly with the last section of the project be ing rushed, over a period of 2 to 3 days. I therefore feel that I could have improved my own personal performance by taking a much more active spot in project management. This would enable me to ensure that each individual was working within the timeframe and I was not required to rush during the last few days of the project, potentially sacrificing the quality of the work. References Boud D & Walker D (1993) Barriers to Reflection on Experience. In Boud D,. Cohen R & Walker D. Using Experience for Learning. Buckingham parliamentary law for Research into Higher Education & candid University Press.Coleman, P (2011). The Five Percent conclusion Solutions to Seemingly Impossible Conflicts. Public Affairs. upstart York, p.26Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA Brooks/Cole.Jarboe, S. C., & Witteman, H. R. (1996). Intragroup conflict management in task-oriented groups The influence of problem sources and problem analysis. Small Group Research, 27, 316338 .Schon D. (1996). From Technical intellect to Reflection in Action, In Edwards, R., Hanson, A., and P Raggatt (eds) Boundaries of Adult Learning, London, Routledge.